## Water Resources of North Dakota |

STREAMS IN THE LOWER RED RIVER OF

THE NORTH BASIN, NORTH DAKOTA,

MINNESOTA, AND MANITOBA

U.S. Geological Survey Open-File Report 98-21

Prepared in cooperation with the

RED RIVER WATERSHED MANAGEMENT BOARD

and the RED RIVER JOINT WATER RESOURCE BOARD

05065500 Goose River near Portland, ND

05066500 Goose River at Hillsboro, ND

05067500 Marsh River near Shelly, MN

05068000 Sand Hill River at Beltrami, MN

05068500 Sand Hill Ditch at Beltrami, MN

05069000 Sand Hill River at Climax, MN

05074500 Red Lake River near Red Lake, MN

05075000 Red Lake River at High Landing near Goodridge, MN

05076000 Thief River near Thief River Falls, MN

05076500 Red Lake River at Thief River Falls, MN

05077500 Clearwater River near Leonard, MN

05077700 Ruffy Brook near Gonvick, MN

05078000 Clearwater River at Plummer, MN

05078230 Lost River at Oklee, MN

05078500 Clearwater River at Red Lake Falls, MN

05079000 Red Lake River at Crookston, MN

05082500 Red River of the North at Grand Forks, ND

05083000 Turtle River at Manvel, ND

05083500 Red River of the North at Oslo, MN

05083600 Middle Branch Forest River near Whitman, ND

05084000 Forest River near Fordville, ND

05085000 Forest River at Minto, ND

05087500 Middle River at Argyle, MN

05088000 South Branch Park River near Park River, ND

05089000 South Branch Park River below Homme Dam, ND

05089100 Middle Branch Park River near Union, ND

05089500 Cart Creek at Mountain, ND

05090000 Park River at Grafton, ND

05092000 Red River of the North at Drayton, ND

05092200 Pembina County Drain 20 near Glasston, ND

05093000 South Branch Two Rivers at Pelan, MN

05094000 South Branch Two Rivers at Lake Bronson, MN

05095500 Two Rivers below Hallock, MN

05096000 North Branch Two Rivers near Lancaster, MN

05096500 State Ditch 85 near Lancaster, MN

05098700 Hidden Island Coulee near Hansboro, ND

05098800 Cypress Creek near Sarles, ND

05099100 Snowflake Creek near Snowflake, MB

05099150 Mowbray Creek near Mowbray, MB

05099300 Pembina River near Windygates, MB

05099400 Little South Pembina River near Walhalla, ND

05099600 Pembina River at Walhalla, ND

05100000 Pembina River at Neche, ND

05100500 Herzog Creek near Concrete, ND

05101000 Tongue River at Akra, ND

05101500 Tongue River at Cavalier, ND

05102500 Red River Of The North at Emerson, MB

Statistical summaries of streamflow data through water year 1994 for selected active and discontinued U.S. Geological Survey gaging stations for the Red River of the North Basin downstream of Halstad, Minnesota, to and including Emerson, Manitoba, are presented in this report. The summaries for each streamflow-gaging station include (1) station description, (2) graph of the annual mean discharge for the period of record, (3) statistics of monthly and annual mean discharges, (4) graph of the annual flow duration, (5) monthly and annual flow duration, (6) probability of occurrence of annual high discharges, (7) probability of occurrence of annual low discharges, (8) probability of occurrence of seasonal low discharges, (9) annual peak discharge and corresponding gage height for the period of record, and (10) monthly and annual mean discharges for the period of record.

A part of the mission of the United States Geological Survey is the collection of systematic data to determine the quantity, quality, and use of surface and ground water. A total of 7,292 streamflow-gaging stations (as of 1994) were operated by the U. S. Geological Survey in the United States, Puerto Rico, and the Trust Territories of the Pacific Islands (Wahl and others, 1995). Of the 7,292 streamflow-gaging stations, 60 were operated in the Red River of the North Basin upstream of Emerson, Manitoba, excluding the Devils Lake Basin.

At streamflow-gaging stations, the water level in the river is monitored continually. A relation between water level and discharge is developed by making periodic discharge measurements throughout the range in water level. This relation is referred to as a station rating. A continuous record of streamflow is computed for each gaging station by using the water level record and the station rating.

Knowledge of the magnitude and time distribution of streamflow is essential for all aspects of water management and environmental planning. Federal, State, and local agencies responsible for the development and management of North Dakota's surface-water resources use this knowledge for making safe, economical, and environmentally sound water-resource planning decisions.

Streamflow statistics published in annual state water reports by the U. S. Geological Survey include records of daily mean discharge, annual high and low discharge, and annual mean discharge. Other statistics can be retrieved from U.S. Geological Survey computer files. Water resource managers may go to various sources to obtain the necessary statistics. These sources may only include active gaging stations listed in the most recent annual report and, thus, overlook information available for many discontinued gaging stations.

The purpose of this report is to provide a comprehensive publication summarizing streamflow statistics through water year 1994 for selected active and discontinued gaging stations for the Red River of the North Basin downstream of Halstad, Minnesota, to and including Emerson, Manitoba. Active and discontinued gaging stations listed in this report have a least 10 years of record. These stations are listed in table 1.

Much of the history of the stream-gaging program in North Dakota outlined in this report was written by Crosby (1970). However, the number of streamflow-gaging stations given in figure 2 may differ from the number given by Crosby (1970) because the type of gaging stations included may differ. The collection of systematic streamflow data began in 1882 when a gaging station was established on the Red River of the North at Grand Forks. This gaging station was a stage station; however, infrequent discharge measurements were made for navigational purposes. Stage data were obtained on the Missouri River at Bismarck in 1881-82 and in 1886-89 by the Missouri River Commission. As result of the National Reclamation Act of 1902 and the disastrous flood in 1897 in the Red River of the North Basin, the U.S. Geological Survey, in cooperation with the state of North Dakota, established and operated streamflow-gaging stations from 1901-09 . Additional interest was created as problems with Canada concerning the division of waters along the international boundary resulted in the formation of the International Joint Commission in 1912. Eight streamflow-gaging stations were in operation in 1925 when State cooperation was discontinued . Only five federally operated gaging stations were continued. State cooperation resumed in 1931, but funds were limited from 1934-38. However, the Rivers and Harbors Act of 1927 and the Flood Control Acts of 1928 and 1936 resulted in the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers supporting a large expansion of the stream-gaging program. Forty-one gaging stations were in operation when the North Dakota-South Dakota U.S. Geological Survey Office was created on October 16, 1944. Plans for the coordinated development of the waters of the Missouri River Basin, with respect to flood control, navigation, power, and irrigation, were formulated in 1943-44 by the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, the Bureau of Reclamation, and the States in the Basin. These plans resulted in a rapid increase in the stream-gaging program, and, by 1947, 64 gaging stations were in operation in North Dakota. The number of gaging stations grew steadily from the late 1940's until the late 1960's, and, by 1969, 109 gaging stations were in operation.

During 1969-76, the number of gaging stations in operation remained relatively stable. During the 1970's, the U.S. Geological Survey established 25 additional gaging stations to monitor the quantity and quality of streamflow in drainage basins underlain by strippable lignite deposits (Haffield, 1981). By 1979, about 145 gaging stations were in operation in North Dakota. During 1981-83, the number of gaging stations in operation declined rapidly, and, during 1984-87, the number declined slowly to about 110. Since 1987, the number of gaging stations in operation has been relatively stable at about 105 to 110.

Station summaries are presented so that each station description and tables of streamflow statistics and probabilities of occurrence are presented in the same order and format for each gaging station, including the same relative placement of the pages. Because the information and statistics in the tables were created by "data retrievals" or statistical program results, significant figures were not rounded to U.S. Geological Survey standards. The order of presentation is as follows:

1. station description,

2. graph of the annual mean discharge for the period of record,

3. table of statistics of monthly and annual mean discharges,

Table 1. List of streamflow-gaging stations in the lower Red River of the North Basin for which streamflow statistics are published in this report [ND,North Dakota; MN, Minnesota; MB, Manitoba]______________________________________________________________________ Station number Station name ______________________________________________________________________05064900 Beaver Creek near Finley, ND 05065500 Goose River near Portland, ND 05066500 Goose River at Hillsboro, ND 05067500 Marsh River near Shelly, MN 05068000 Sand Hill River at Beltrami, MN 05068500 Sand Hill Ditch at Beltrami, MN 05069000 Sand Hill River at Climax, MN 05074500 Red Lake River near Red Lake, MN 05075000 Red Lake River at Highlanding near Goodridge, MN 05076000 Thief River near Thief River Falls, MN 05076500 Thief River at Thief River Falls, MN 05077500 Clearwater River near Leonard, MN 05077700 Ruffy Brook near Gonvick, MN 05078000 Clearwater River at Plummer, MN 05078230 Lost River at Oklee, MN 05078500 Clearwater River at Red Lake Falls, MN 05079000 Red Lake River at Crookston, MN 05082500 Red River of the North at Grand Forks, ND 05083000 Turtle River at Manvel, ND 05083500 Red River of the North at Oslo, MN 05083600 Middle Branch Forest River near Whitman, ND 05084000 Forest River near Fordville, ND 05085000 Forest River at Minto, ND 05087500 Middle River at Argyle, MN 05088000 South Branch Park River near Park River, ND 05089000 South Branch Park River below Homme Dam, ND 05089100 Middle Branch Park River near Union, ND 05089500 Cart Creek at Mountain, ND 05090000 Park River at Grafton, ND 05092000 Red River of the North at Drayton, ND 05092200 Pembina County Drain 20 near Glasston, ND 05093000 South Branch Two Rivers at Pelon, MN 05094000 South Branch Two Rivers at Lake Bronson, MN 05095500 Two Rivers below Hallock, MN 05096000 North Branch Two Rivers near Lancaster, MN 05096500 State Ditch 85 near Lancaster, MN 05098700 Hidden Island Coulee near Hansboro, ND 05098800 Cypress Creek near Sarles, ND 05099100 Snowflake Creek near Snowflake, MB 05099150 Mowbray Creek near Mowbray, MB 05099300 Pembina River near Windygates, MB 05099400 Little South Pembina River near Walhalla, ND 05099600 Pembina River at Walhalla, ND 05100000 Pembina River at Neche, ND 05100500 Herzog Creek near Concrete, ND 05101000 Tongue River at Akra, ND 05101500 Tongue River at Cavalier, ND 05102500 Red River of the North at Emerson, MB______________________________________________________________________

4. graph of the annual flow duration,

5. table of monthly and annual flow duration,

6. table of probability of occurrence of annual high discharges,

7. table of probability of occurrence of annual low discharges,

8. table of probability of occurrence of seasonal low discharges,

9. table of annual peak discharge and corresponding gage height for the period of record, and

10. table of monthly and annual me an discharges for the period of record.

Where both pre-regulation and post-regulation statistics are presented for a gaging station, the station description, graph of annual mean discharges, table of annual peak discharges and corresponding gage heights, and table of monthly and annual mean discharges are presented with the pre- and post-regulation data. The respective tables for the pre- and post-regulation data are presented in the same relative page format as non-regulated streams.

The location, drainage area, period of record, and other information about each streamflow-gaging station are included in the station description. This information is compiled from records maintained by the U.S. Geological Survey and generally is presented in the same format as published in the annual state water report. The following comments clarify information presented under the various headings of the station description.

LOCATION.--Information on gaging station location is obtained from the most accurate maps available and is furnished with respect to cultural and physical features in the vicinity of the gaging station and the community or landmark included in the gaging station name. In the case of discontinued gaging stations, the location is furnished using features in the vicinity at the time the gaging station was in operation. In many instances, the identifying features have been altered since the gaging station was discontinued.

DRAINAGE AREA.--Drainage area is measured using U.S. Geological Survey 7.5-minute topographic quadrangle maps. However, 7.5-minute top ographic maps for drainage area computations were not available when some gaging stations were installed; therefore, the accuracy of drainage areas also varies. Drainage areas of discontinued gaging stations are those determined while the gaging station was in operation.

PERIOD OF RECORD.--The period of record is the period for which there are published records for the gaging station or for an equivalent gaging station. An equivalent gaging station is a gaging station that was in operation in a different location prior to the subject gaging station, and whose location is such that records from it can reasonably be considered equivalent with records from the subject gaging station. This situation arises when a gaging station is relocated upstream or downstream and given a new gaging station number and name, but the changes in drainage area and other basin characteristics are not significantly different. Period of record to current year indicates that the station was in operation as of September 30, 1994.

GAGE.--The type of gage or recorder that is or was used to collect data, the datum of the gage referred to sea level, and a condensed history of the types, locations, and datums of previous gages are given under this heading.

EXTREMES FOR PERIOD OF RECORD.--Extremes may include maximum and minimum discharges and maximum and minimum gage heights. Unless other wise qualified, the maximum discharge is the instantaneous maximum discharge corresponding to the highest gage height that occurred. I f the maximum gage height did not occur on the same day as the maximum discharge, it is listed separately. Similarly, the minimum discharge is the instantaneous minimum discharge corresponding to the lowest gage height that occurred, unless qualified and listed otherwise.

EXTREMES OUTSIDE PERIOD OF RECORD.--Included is any information available concerning major floods or unusually low flows that occurred outside the stated period of record. The information may not have been obtained by the U.S. Geological Survey.

Statistics of monthly and annual mean discharges presented for each gaging station include (1) the maximum, minimum, and mean monthly discharges and (2) the maximum, minimum, and mean annual discharges. The water years (October 1 through September 30) in which the maximum and minimum discharges occurred are listed with the respective values, and the standard deviation and coefficient of variation of the monthly and annual mean discharges are listed with the respective values. Also, the percentage of the annual discharge that is comprised by each monthly mean discharge is listed in the table.

Each of the statistics is explained in the following paragraphs. As an aid to the readers' understanding of how the monthly mean and annual mean discharges are determined, data for the gaging station Red Lake River at Crookston, MN (05079000, p. 143-153) are used as an example. The monthly mean value is the average of the daily values for the month. The annual mean value is the average of the daily values for the year. Months or years for which all daily values are not available are not included in the compilation of statistics.

The maximum monthly mean discharge is the maximum value of all the monthly mean values. The maximum mean value for October is 2,840
cubic feet per second (ft^{3}/s), which occurred during water year 1972. Similarly, the minimum monthly mean discharge is the minimum value
of all the monthly mean values. The minimum mean value for October is 8.02 ft^{3}/s, which occurred during water year 1937. The maximum
and minimum monthly mean values can be found in the statistics of monthly and annual mean discharges table or by searching the monthly
and annual mean discharges table.

The mean monthly discharge is the mean of all the monthly mean discharges for a given month, and the standard deviation is a measure of
the variability of the values. The mean monthly discharge for October is 805 ft^{3}/s, and the standard deviation is 689 ft^{3}/s. The
monthly mean discharge for October (mean of the mean monthly values) is the same as the mean of all October daily values for the period of
record used. However, the standard deviation is smaller than the standard deviation obtained using all daily values. The standard
deviation is smaller because the monthly values have less variability than the daily values.

The coefficient of variation is the ratio of the standard deviation to the mean. The coefficient of variation is dimensionless. Because monthly mean discharges are generally much greater in spring than in winter, the standard deviations also are generally much greater in spring than in winter. However, dividing the standard deviation by the mean monthly discharge tends to equalize the measures for all months so a more meaningful comparison among months can be made.

The percentage of the annual discharge is the percent of the annual discharge that occurred during each month. It is calculated by dividing the mean discharge for the month by the total of the 12 monthly mean discharges and multiplying by 100. Because of rounding of the monthly percentage, the sum of the 12 percentages may not equal 100 percent.

The maximum, minimum, and mean annual discharges are selected or computed from the annual mean discharges for the period of record. The
water years of occurrence of the maximum and minimum values are listed with the respective values, and the standard deviation of the
mean of the annual mean values is listed with the mean value. The minimum annual mean discharge of 132 ft^{3}/s occurred in 1935, and the
maximum annual mean discharge of 3,130 ft^{3}/s occurred in 1950. The mean annual discharge for the period of record is 1,110 ft^{3}/s.

The monthly and annual flow duration table is a magnitude and frequency analysis of daily discharge values. It is computed by tabulating
the number of daily discharge values that fall within preselected class limits, computing the percentage of values within each class,
and interpolating discharge values for the percentages shown in the table. Monthly values are calculated from daily values in all
complete months in the record, and annual figures are calculated for all complete water years. For example, if the 90-percent flow duration
value for October is 101 ft^{3}/s, then 90 percent of all October daily discharge values for the period of record were equal to or greater
than 101 ft3/s.

The probabilities of occurrence of annual high discharges, annual low discharges, and seasonal low discharges are presented in three
tables for each gaging station. Probability of occurrence is an estimate of the likelihood that a particular discharge in a stream will
be equaled or exceeded in 1 year or, in the case of low flows, the likelihood that the discharge will not be equaled or exceeded during
the year. The probability of occurrence of a high flow is called the exceedance probability, and the probability of occurrence of low
flow is called the nonexceedance probability. For example, if the maximum instantaneous discharge for the 0.20 exceedance probability
is listed as 13,100 ft^{3}/s, then a 20 percent chance exists that a discharge equal to or greater than 13,100 ft^{3}/s will occur once during
the year.

Recurrence interval is another way of expressing annual probability and it is the reciprocal of probability of occurrence. The recurrence
interval for an exceedance probability of 0.20 is 5 years (1 divided by 0.20). For a long discharge record the annual maximum discharge
can be expected to equal or exceed 13,100 ft^{3}/s on average once every 5 years.

The table of probability of occurrence of annual high discharges for each gaging station lists the maximum instantaneous discharge and the maximum mean discharge for 3, 7, 15, and 30 consecutive-day periods for selected exceedance probabilities and recurrence intervals. Values for the maximum instantaneous discharge are computed from the streamflow record according to the guidelines established by the Hydrology Subcommittee of the Interagency Advisory Committee on Water Data (1982). According to the guidelines, adjustments are made for length of record and regional skew.

Values for the maximum mean discharges for 3, 7, 15, and 30 consecutive-day periods are computed from the annual high mean values of the corresponding periods. The computations are based on the log-Pearson Type III distribution using values obtained for the water year.

The table of probability of occurrence of annual low discharges for each gaging station lists the minimum mean discharge for 1, 3, 7, 1 4, 30, 60, 90, 120, and 183 consecutive-day periods for selected nonexceedance probabilities and recurrence intervals. Values for the minimum mean discharges are computed from the annual low discharge values of the corresponding periods using the log-Pearson Type III distribution. If the log-Pearson Type III distribution curve fails to fit the data at the lower end, a graphical interpretation is made. Probabilities of annual low discharges are computed using values obtained for the climatic year (April 1 through March 31).

The table of probability of occurrence of seasonal low discharges for each gaging station lists the minimum mean discharge for 1, 7, 14, and 30 consecutive-day periods for selected probabilities and recurrence intervals. These values are computed from the seasonal low mean values of the corresponding periods using the log-Pearson Type III distribution.

The annual low discharge and the seasonal low discharges that occur in any given year are sensitive to natural-channel processes, such as evapotranspiration and human-induced hydrologic modifications, such as the operation of many small water-storage reservoirs; the effects of surface-water withdrawal for agricultural, municipal, and industrial use; and the effects of return flow to the river. Thus, the statistics in tables are given for recurrence intervals that generally are within twice the period of record.

The reliability of statistical data is related to the length of record for a stream. The Hydrology Subcommittee of the Interagency Advisory committee on Water Data (1982) recommends that at least 10 years of record be used for computing flood frequency estimates. Therefore, the length of record criterion for inclusion of a gaging station in this report is at least 10 years. Even with this criterion, the lengths and continuity of record for the gaging stations vary substantially. Subsequently, extreme high or low flows may be included in the streamflow record of one gaging station and not in another, resulting in inconsistencies in the streamflow statistics when comparing gaging station data. Also, longer record lengths for many of the gaging stations in this report may result in different streamflow statistics when comparing data in this report with data in previous publications.

Differences in statistical data for pre- and post-regulation periods may not be caused solely by regulation. Differences also can be
attributed to the length of record and climatic variability as expressed by hydrologic variability. By comparing a statistic that easily
can be affected by regulation, such as the
7-day low flow, and a statistic that generally is unaffected by regulation, such as the mean annual discharge, a determination can be
made about the effect of regulation. As an example, the annual 7-day low flow with a 10-year recurrence interval for the Red River of
the North at Fargo (Wiche and Williams-Sether, 1997) is 0 ft^{3}/s for the pre-regulation period (1901-41) and 17.9 ft^{3}/s for the post-regulation
period (1942-94). The effect of regulation on the mean annual discharge of the Red River of the North can be assumed to be negligible;
however, the mean annual discharge is 403 ft^{3}/s for the pre-regulation period and 741 ft^{3}/s for the post-regulation period. Although
annual 7-day low flow for a 10-year recurrence interval is much greater for the regulation period, the mean annual discharge for
the regulated period also is much greater, indicating that regulation may happen to correspond to a relatively wet period in the Red River
of the North Basin and may not be the sole factor for differences in statistical data for pre- and post-regulation periods.

821 East Interstate Avenue

Bismarck, ND 58503

Phone: (701)250-7400

Fax: (701)250-7492

Office hours: 8:00 a.m. to 5:00 p.m. CST

For more information on all USGS

reports and products (including maps,

images, and computerized data), call

1-888-ASK-USGS.

Additional earth science information

can be found by accessing the USGS

Home Page on the World Wide Web at http://www.usgs.gov

Inquire on this report: Gregg J. Wiche

Click to Return to Table of Contents

Click to Return to North Dakota Home Page

U.S. Department of the Interior ||
U.S. Geological Survey Maintainer: Webmaster Last update: Monday, 23-Aug-2004 16:21:09 EDT Privacy || Disclaimer|| Accessibility || FOIA URL: http://nd.water.usgs.gov/pubs/ofr/ofr9821/index.html |